Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given pie parts compare the overall amount of expenses in a particular Britain school throughout the passage of twenty years, from 1981 to 2001.
Looking from the overall perspective, total spending on teachers’ wages was accounting for the largest share during the whole period, while insurance expenses appeared to be the least of all. In particular, expenses on teachers’ salaries were fluctuating between 40% and 50%, totaling approximately half of overall spending in 1991 and then decreased moderately down to 45% by the end of the period.
Turning to the other workers’ wages, we notice that total spending on them has a downward trend: every 10 years the school reduced the number of funds for their payment by almost 6%. In 1981 the expenses on other stuff’s salaries constituted 28% of the total budget, in 1991 and 2001 22% and 15% respectively. The outlays on different types of school facilities had opposite patterns. The spending on books resources and furniture and equipment was making up equal shares of 15% in 1981, nevertheless, during the next decade, the percentage correlations were changed dramatically. The expenses on books increased by 5%, whereas furniture and equipment spending experienced a sharp decline of 10%. What follows is different: in 2001 the outlay on school facilities went up reaching the point of 23% and the expenses on books were rapidly fell down by more than10%.
Overall, the remaining share of expenses was directed to insurance payments and was equaling to 2-3% from 1981 to 1991 and by the end of 2001 it has grown up to 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...correlations were changed dramatically. The expenses on books increased by 5%, wher...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, then, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 965.302439024 138% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06870229008 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81192819165 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9569768626 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.8 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15729218329 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666380994855 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035094098988 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101280000898 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350765297324 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.