the three charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The three pie charts depict the differences in yearly budget of a specific school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
In general, there were five categories composed of the total annual spending, including teachers’ salaries, furniture and equipment, resources, other workers’ salaries and insurance. Of which the first mentioned category was the highest while the lowest budget went to insurance.
Looking at the biggest proportion of these charts, spending on teachers’ salaries experienced an inconsistent trend as the percentage in the first studied year was 40 whilst the figure of the following year was 50, then it slightly dropped by 5 percent in 2001. Budget for resources witnessed the same movement. Its segment in the last year fell significantly to 9 percent compared to the two previous year. Conversely, the fluctuation saw on furniture and equipment was a slump in the started year before a recovery in final year.
These two remaining groups displayed stable changes. Insurance’s expense kept gradually increasing by 6 percent during the reporting periods, whereas spending on other workers’ salaries underwent a downfall by 13 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, look, so, then, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41758241758 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98401732181 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648351648352 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8493029937 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0965676829567 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413367431116 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792040031558 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856034364638 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100792177534 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.