The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The graph demonstrates the quantities of fish and three kinds of meat consumed in a country in Europe during the period of 15-year from 1974 to 2004.
With regard to consumption of cattle’s meat, despite beef’s popularity saw a high in the first 10 years with peak at 230grams per person per week, this number plummeted more than a half, ending at just over 100grams. Also lamb experienced the similar movement, starting at exactly 150 grams and rapidly dropped thereafter to approximately 60 at the end.
Turning to the last kind of meat and fish, chicken’s starting point was average with 140 grams and moderately fluctuated before finishing at almost 248, far outweighed the rest. The only aquatic animal appeared to be least favored as its consumption was nowhere near as much as meat. However, its trend was quite stable and the number shifted between over 60 and roughly 40 grams.
In summary, what stands out from the graph is that the citizen of researched country added up more chicken in their weekly diet. By contrast, consumption of both fish and meat experienced inconsistent trend over the studied period. Quantities of beef, lamb and fish consumed decreased at the end, especially the slump of beef.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n a half, ending at just over 100grams. Also lamb experienced the similar movement, ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, in summary, kind of, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98048780488 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65706381224 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643902439024 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2685430026 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139855877314 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616770438891 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492154800988 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988795990692 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538070968353 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.