The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The charts give information about amounts of electricity produced by various fuel sources in two countries including Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Regarding Australia, there were four different kinds of fuel source used to generate electricity which consisted of coal, oil, natural gas and hydro power. Total production in 1980 was 100 units in which coal took account for half of production while natural gas and hydro power had equal proportion with 20. Only 10 units was produced by oil. Twenty years later, total production saw a significant increase and reached 170 units as much more coal was employed for manufacturing. The similar movement applied for hydro gas with 36, in the other hand, both oil and natural gas witnessed a slump and hit identical unit as just 2.
Turning to France, it is recognizable that nuclear power was added in use. In 1980, France produced 10 units less than Australia and the amount of each source was relatively similar: coal and natural gas shared the highest by 25 units, followed by oil with 20, nuclear power and hydro power was 15 and 5 respectively. In 2000, however, nuclear power dominated and took account for 126 out of 180 units whilst oil and coal produced 25 units each, natural gas and hydro power sharply decreased to 2 units each.
In summary, coal was the main source in electricity production in Australia during studied periods. Meanwhile, in France, despite there was no superior source in 1980, we saw a great deal of change in 2000 when nuclear power became the most popular source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...wer sharply decreased to 2 units each. In summary, coal was the main source in el...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 965.302439024 134% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90151515152 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54178803395 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55303030303 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1728819221 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272933679691 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122949416279 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956085383497 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216479678439 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933445410085 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.