In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this case? What can be done about this problem?
Why hunger as well as malnutrition are still one of the biggest social issues in the word full of cutting-edge technologies and the advanced agricultural practices? There exist two main underlying factors to this problem. First, it is cheap labor used by giants of international trade, while the second is lack of infrastructure in the areas where hunger prospers. After the deeper discussions of these causes, the practical changes could be introduced in this essay.
As for the first cause, one can assume that a great variety of multinational companies, despite the fact that they have already achieved large capitalization rates, are still bent on rising the capital by some unsustainable ways. For example, Mars Corporation, being one of the leaders in confectionary industry, was not long ago accused of using cheap labor in China. This practice, besides being unethical, also mitigates all the advanced technologies used in agriculture by simply paying relatively tiny wages to Chinese workers, resulting in hunger in certain areas, since people just do not have funds to buy food.
Secondly, advances made in agriculture in some developed countries have no connection with infrastructure and agricultural work in developing ones. The areas in Brazil or Mongolia which, however, have highly favorable for agriculture soil, are still undeveloped and lack technology, meaning the population of these areas is also deeply depend on the weather conditions. For instance, when the weather is good, people have sufficient level of harvest, but over a span of bad weather conditions, the residents have nothing to it. Moreover, there is no advanced polices, according to which developed countries would help areas in which hunger is a usual thing, that have proved itself sufficient.
Going to the possible resolution to this problem, one can name special regulations to be lifted by the states or even by well-known world organizations, such as Greenpeace or OUN. The aim of such regulation should be prohibition of cheap labor and overuse of resources of developing countries. Fair trade principles could help on one dimension, but still there are companies with wholehearted aim to raise money by any means. As a result, they just do not pay any attention to these principles; and only strict bans could force them to conform to the fair-trade policy. In addition, the programs under which developed countries with advanced auriculate should provide permanent support to the areas of malnutrition should be introduced, since it is the only way to fulfill the food need of some poorer areas.
After the discussion of aforementioned causes and methods, it is of great importance to say that hunger issue is assumed to be the global problem. Advances made in agriculture should be widespread and cover not only the developed economies but also some poor regions. The only way to do it is to unite the resources and lend the hand to those in need without waiting to anything back.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...N. The aim of such regulation should be prohibition of cheap labor and overuse of resources...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 41.998997996 181% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 1615.20841683 155% => OK
No of words: 483.0 315.596192385 153% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17805383023 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68799114503 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.964735359 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 176.041082164 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532091097308 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6352812444 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.631578947 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4210526316 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210482583315 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644670481932 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548215858947 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117574933152 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281948823419 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.