Many people from many countries are undernourished despite of the improvement in agriculture. This is because of the tax on food and is on the rise and the reducing tax on foodstuff could be the effective way to overcome this problem.
Firstly, the reason why people still go starved is the rapid increasing in levy on food resources nowadays. Therefore, higher rate of tax should be paid be food companies to produce foodstuffs. Secondly, it is hard for people who have low-income can afford to buy food products. In addition, if those products are exported to another country, citizen in that country have to pay a higher price for those due to their country’s tax imposing. For example, price of Australia food resources are extremely high and it will be even higher for people in another country if they want to buy it.
In this case, to overcome this problem government should decrease the tax on food resources to allow more and more people all around the world are able to buy. Thus, it will be a big fall in the rate of people go hungry. With the tax on food get lower means that food companies are able to sell or export their products with a more reasonable price. In Vietnam for instant, people are able to find and buy quality ingredients with a very cheap price due to the low levy on food companies.
In conclusion, a number of people who still are undernourished even there are a big improvement in agriculture around the world. This is because of the high tax was imposed on food resources and, to pass this drawback government should be reduce the levy on food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 239, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduced'?
Suggestion: reduced
...pass this drawback government should be reduce the levy on food.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63475177305 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66930842814 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.561755894193 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8533465621 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.538461538 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244539205492 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101883992381 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071304111891 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176683807841 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505808393561 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.