Some minority languages may disappear in the future because of the lack of people speak these languages are decreasing day after day. Although, it can be argued that whether governments should spend money to save these languages or not. I believe that is a waste of money to preserve and protect these languages.
On the one hand, some people argue that government should try to save these languages, which has less of speaker. A language play a vital role of showing the cultural identity of people who speak it. Moreover, some countries believe that a language is a symbol of their national independence. For this reason, if a language disappears, we will lost all the rich cultural diversity that makes societies more interesting. In this case, by spent money to preserve and protect minority languages, governments are be able to save the unique traditions, civilizations that are part of a country’s history.
On the other hand, spending too much money for saving languages that have small group of people speak these languages could be seen a waste of money. First, in spite of spending money for these languages, governments could upgrade the learning programmes for students or they are able to use that amount of money for poor children and people who are in need by donating. Second, this money might be cheaper and more efficient to pay for public services. Meanwhile, paying money for protecting languages would be higher and even ineffective.
In conclusion, I believe that spend money to save minority languages would take a long time and a huge amount of money. Conversely, paying money for inhabitant’s sake would be efficient in the long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 345, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lose'
Suggestion: lose
...ason, if a language disappears, we will lost all the rich cultural diversity that ma...
^^^^
Line 2, column 510, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ect minority languages, governments are be able to save the unique traditions, civ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, while, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03237410072 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83794712693 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507194244604 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6965500218 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9285714286 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426443077398 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167923705029 0.084324248473 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866596995247 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283289060209 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570515366435 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.