Nowadays, I believe that universities should give both men and women the same educational opportunities. However, I disagree with the idea of having equal proportions of each gender in every subject.
First, having the same number of student in each gender on all courses is basically unrealistic. Scholar number depends on the favour and the application of each student. In fact, if institution want to divide the number of males and females into the same each class, it would need enough application of each gender. Especially many subjects attract one gender more than other, and it would be impractical to fill courses with equal gender. For example, engineering and electrician are more popular with male student with over sixty per cent of application a year. On the contrary, females are attracted by gently jobs such as secretary and nurse, etc.
Second, it would be unfair if universities based on the number between male and female to select candidate for each course. Conversely universities should continue to select student according to their qualifications. For this purpose, successful achievements depend on the time they spent in order to improve themselves. On the other side, it is extremely wrong to reject the best candidate just because one gender group of student is bigger than the other, or the average number of each gender have already been full. And that student have to change the course or waiting for next semester to apply in this course.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that universities should give the same educational advantages for both males and females in any course. But it would be not practical to equalize the application of each gender in every course.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 653, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y jobs such as secretary and nurse, etc. Second, it would be unfair if universiti...
^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...le to select candidate for each course. Conversely universities should continue to select ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, second, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1426.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79983610801 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519713261649 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8415072601 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237484612852 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895482989563 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480091540553 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165933494103 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192168801871 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.