The bar chart compares the enrolment of men and women into full-time and part-time British further education programs in the 1970, 1980 and 1990 school years.
It is clear that the number of men and women enrolled in part-time British higher education witnessed a steadily increase after three periods. The figure of female fulltime-education participants also rose gradually however, there was a fluctuation in number of men enrolled in full-time education at the same periods.
Men and women enrolment in part-time education both gradually increased from around 100k and almost 100k to around 300k people respectively after 20 years. In addition, full-time education female participents also rose from above 700k to around 800k and then jumped to aroung 1100k at the end of the periods. In constrast, after a drop from 1000k to under 900k in the 1980s, men’s number increased to 900k in the 1990s.
In the 1970s and 1980s, enrolment of men in higher-education programs was higher than women with 1000k and under 900k compare to under 800k and above 800k respectively. While in the last periods, women’s figure was outraced men’s with around 1100k compare to around 900k respectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('steadily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...time British higher education witnessed a steadily increase after three periods. The figure of fema...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... number increased to 900k in the 1990s. In the 1970s and 1980s, enrolment of men...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...mber increased to 900k in the 1990s. In the 1970s and 1980s, enrolment of men i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.234375 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88663388135 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463541666667 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8142829567 43.030603864 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.013656033333 0.215688989381 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00779506162812 0.103423049105 8% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0100677100668 0.0843802449381 12% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0110728797891 0.15604864568 7% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0073353740509 0.0819641961636 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.