Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.Discuss both these views and give your opinion
People have different views about spending public money that is taken by taxes on saving languages which are spoken just by a few numbers of local people in rural or distant areas of the globe. While there are some persuasive arguments in favor of saving languages that are in danger of extinction, I believe this trend would be useless and it is just wasting money.
There are various reasons why I would argue that spending a large amount of money on saving languages that are spoken by small numbers of people is futile. Firstly, the public money should be spent on projects that benefit all residents and enhance the quality of their life such as social welfare, health services and education. Secondly, these are vanity projects for politicians and government authorities that help them to become more popular among people and they are highly unlikely to become a success. Finally, speaking a unique language is beneficial for governments and people in terms of communication, global trading and studying. To support my claim, I can refer to an article having been published in Times magazine, indicates that in 2003, UK spent more than 15 million dollars to train teachers who teach people skittish language which was in verge of extinction. Unfortunately, they could not reach their goals and it was a fiasco for the government.
On the other hand, the importance of saving languages should not be neglected. Nowadays, there are as many local languages as ethnic minorities and language should not be considered simply as a means of communication. It is proved that a language has a vital connection with the cultural identity of people and it represents the culture, custom and traditions of individuals. A particularly salient example of this is the Greece's remains from the time of their ancestors which need to be translated into their dominant language. It would not be feasible without any knowledge of the Greece's ancient language.
In conclusion, although there are some positive aspects in saving the spoken languages that are in danger of vanishing, the drawbacks by far outweigh the advantages. Governments can eradicate poverty, diminish the increased number of crimes and enhance the quality of life for all the residents by spending the public money on social welfare.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76264499365 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525198938992 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.1961556964 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.266666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1333333333 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38413020152 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122785432443 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866619576114 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233807545624 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073713614858 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.