In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.What is the cause? What can be done about this problem?

An increasing number of people all over the world is currently passing their life with no or little food despite the huge development of technology in agriculture. There are several causes of this problem and the solution of these problems are critical which should be handled by centrally.

At the age of technological development, producing food is now more convenient, by using advance technology, than past and use these to fulfill daily necessities of all classes of people. But the current situation is unacceptable where many people who lies under the poverty pass their with little food. The main causes of the problem is uneven distribution of wealth between disparate level of people. Consequently, the higher classes of people who consume the most wealth or waste unnecessarily without considering the indigence people who live in suffer. On the other hand, the merchants, who is also responsible of this situation, store the goods to get higher profit in the future. As a result, the prices of these goods will rise too high which is out of ability to purchase for poor people that led to live them with hunger.

To overcome this problem, government should take considerable steps that could alleviate the problem. For example, there should be extreme law or condemn for those people who illegally store food for more profit and, therefore, confined them not to raise price of goods too high. Another solution would be even distribution of wealth and property among the people to mitigate the problem and, along with, subvert the poverty from the country.

In conclusion, although, the number of people, who is passing their life with little food, is huge despite of technological development, action taken by government and properly distribution of wealth obviously will propitiate the problem.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...ld is currently passing their life with no or little food despite the huge develop...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... obviously will propitiate the problem.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18027210884 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78680217642 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554421768707 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2893769718 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148952633203 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623232559193 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402871147993 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0987680204831 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533310905939 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.