In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Despite the appearance of breakthroughs made in agriculture, it is widely accepted that starvation has haunted people living in several areas over the world. In my perspective, this phenomenon is mainly attributable to three main factors, and the joint effort of the governments and international organizations could address this severe issue.
The explanation for the hunger in the context that several recent improvements are invented in agriculture could be climate change, low-level income, and political instability. Firstly, with the low living standard, some households lose their opportunities to reach modern agricultural systems. To be more exact, the lack of proper education, along with the poverty of people in third-world countries, makes these farmers the disability to buy or control technological devices to improve their cultivation. The next reason could be the unstable polity in some countries having wars. Weapons could destroy the majority of agricultural lands in those countries and roads used for delivering food. Last but not least, extreme weather, the consequence of global warming, has remarkable impacts on cultivation. In some regions, when droughts come more frequently, water shortage hinders crops from thriving naturally. Salinity also gives a hand in the loss of land for agriculture. Moreover, farmers are unable to calculate the right time to cultivate because storms, floods, and other natural disasters have not happened as they did in the past.
Many actions that the governments and international groups could perform to mitigate the foregoing problems. The first solution should focus on the international barrier. Authorities should encourage foreign food exporters to participate in their domestic markets. Also, lawmakers need to allocate their national budget to help their farmers adapt to unprecedented climate shakes. On a global scale, international programs are essential for ensuring food security. Developed countries could carry out some assistance programs in terms of financial, technological issues to help people living in hunger.
In conclusion, challenges related to climate, living standards, and polity cause famines in some regions. Various remedies can be taken to tackle this prominent matter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, moreover, so, third, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1932.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7671641791 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04611618155 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641791044776 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3919842943 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.684210526 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68421052632 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117047307374 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338708695074 0.084324248473 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366373465052 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735959651831 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306536713966 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.89 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.