In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Human beings have made great progress in various aspects, especially in agriculture in our contemporary society. However, it is said that the development of agriculture does not bring any benefits to a practical situation which is the hunger of people all over the world. This essay will examine the main reasons of this case and some viable approach to the problem.
It is obvious that many countries have made some improvements to their agriculture industry such as developing methods of farming or utilizing technological advances. However, those improvements does not mean that the scarcity of food could be solved. Taking shortage of farmland for example. In remote areas, most of the lands are not fertile enough to grow seeds and plants because of soil erosion and lack of irrigation, although farmers have been informed of efficient ways of cultivation through remote viewing. As a result, inhabitants are forced to live at a subsistence level in rural areas, where agriculture is the only livelihood they can depend on. Another reason is that farmers’ poverty prevents them from purchasing modern agriculture machinery to cultivate the land as they would be burdened with debts, which probably means that starvation is inevitable.
There are possible actions which help ameliorate this situation. First of all, the governments should provide food for places where hunger occurs, which would temporarily alleviate the world hunger. Secondly, it is essential that the authorities raise funds with the aim of supporting farmers with agricultural tools. This would motivate farmers to work effectively as well as contribute to land reform process. Another response might be long – term investments in these areas. For example, organizations and companies can build factories related to agriculture and employ local residents as the principal workforce. However, this solution should be considered carefully because it will take a considerable amount of time to be accomplished.
In conclusion, many people believe that the progress of agriculture would not create a world without starvation. Nevertheless, I think that this situation could be resolved with the right solutions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47492625369 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97380247962 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607669616519 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5105251497 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183048576262 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577050609272 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050783319088 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130992513986 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519831987306 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.