Great advances have been achieved in agriculture these years, but starvation is still a serious issue puzzling many regions in the world. Although this problem stems from many factors, I believe that countries and local authorities can take measures to tackle it.
On the one hand, food shortage problems are linked to the gap between the rich and the poor. There is no denying that people suffering from starvasion are usually from developing countries, where advanced technology in agriculture may not be available. Consequently, people depending on traditional farming methods cannot access sufficient food with the increase in family members. On the other hand, geological factors to some extent play a vital role in the development of agriculture. For example, it is difficult for people living in dry areas or mountainous areas to grow crops.
Therefore more effort can be made by countries to address the starvation problem. To start with, a targeted project should be implemented to improve agricultural methods in undeveloped rural areas. With technological or financial support offered by countries, it is promising for those regions to release poverty and make progress in farming. In addition, transitions in the agricultural industry are necessary in areas with poor geological factors. For example, instead of growing crops, soils that contain too much acid can be used by local people to develop tea businesses.
In conclusion, the financial gap and geological factors may lead to starvation problems, but countries and local authorities can make every effort to address them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... or mountainous areas to grow crops. Therefore more effort can be made by countries to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ancial support offered by countries, it is promising for those regions to release poverty an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, so, still, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4297188755 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93213398725 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618473895582 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.3631305496 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204028989888 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662580952233 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555488509251 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118197017777 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727615046532 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.