The society in which people live has undergone a tremendous change in terms of the technology, medication, and environment or so. It is often argued that many people around the globe still suffer from famine, although the massive improvement of agriculture. In my view, there are couple of reasons and the solution to it, which would be elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
The reason for people still afflicted with food shortages is attributed to the overpopulation of the world. Since the improvement of industry and the significant increase in terms of living quality, population grows rapidly over the recent years. Thus, the excessive amount of people incurs overwhelming burden for the human. For instance, food provision is insufficient to be allocated to every individual. Another example could be seen in Africa where over twenty percent of the entire population suffer from famine. To remedy this dire situation, it is imperative for government to regulate the number of the children. In this way, it may curb the overgrowing population.
In addition to the reason as argued above, the rise in the cost of living is another source of problem. Recently, the average expenditure to maintain the livelihood has augmented tremendously. Take Taiwan for example, people used to spend sixty to seventy dollars for a meal in the previous period. However, it costs ninety to a hundred and twenty to purchase the same item nowadays, which is nearly 1.5 to two times of the previous expense. Hence, the soaring price of living renders numerous people who are financially insufficient unaffordable. Approach to this problem could be addressed by the subsidies from the government such as the housing, public transport, and the education.
All in all, as I argued above, it is surely irreversible that the world experiences serious shortages in terms of food. However, there are certain measures for human to implement to at least mitigate the issue. Hence, it is vital for every individual to take collective effort to protect the grave consequence from worsening.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, at least, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20895522388 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91980279898 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564179104478 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.54413953 49.4020404114 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.8421052632 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156202018631 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448408373002 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457406048338 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896582853019 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442425768733 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.