Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The question of whether oral communication or written one is more effective has been a matter of debate since the beginning of the twenty-first century. While there are some benefits of communication through written language, I would agree that it is better to regard communication as a verbal activity.
There are main advantages of written communication. First, thanks to the documents of written communication, important information can be easily preserved and accessed in the future. For example, government regulations were issued through written documents, and as a result citizens are easy to grasp and understand law rules clearly and accurately Second, written communication helps to make communication effective. This means that it is more dependable and effective than those of other forms of communication, which leads to avoid misunderstandings and legal problems in the future.
On the other hand, I believe there are several reasons why many people prefer speaking instead of writing to communicate. Firstly, the verbal form of communication helps to convey messages at a rapid speed. Indeed, face-to-face interaction is more time-saving than writing, and therefore, spoken communication is favorable for daily conversation, especially in case of pressing issues. Secondly, when it comes to express emotions, responses of two-way communication are a wiser choice. For instance, in most U.S elections, two major-party candidates for president have to debate directly, and hence, they fully show personal opinions to persuade voters to vote his or her.
In conclusion, although written communication has some benefits, I believe verbal communication can be more powerful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether oral communication or written one is mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 511, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...a wiser choice. For instance, in most U.S elections, two major-party candidates f...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73122529644 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35612925194 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620553359684 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5601957757 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269846829717 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970377093521 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593835742383 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16852837243 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433647926333 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.