Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
There is a considerable debate among people over whether acquiring the information on the Internet nowadays is becoming easier in comparison with that in the past. Although it is undeniable that the online sources of information are more advantages than libraries, I suppose that traditional libraries are still a great need for students.
On the one hand, accessing information online has many benefits. Firstly, the online sources contain an enormous amount of information which can be much greater than any conventional libraries. This allows Internet users to go online and get the necessary information which is not fully mentioned in the books borrowing from libraries. Secondly, searching online information can be faster and more convenient. In fact, not only students can acquire information and knowledge without any traveling but they can also look for information on the Internet whenever they want, whereas libraries are just active in the specific office hours. Consequently, going online may be better for students who have a busy schedule and live far away from local libraries.
On the other hand, I believe that traditional libraries cannot be replaced by online sources due to their special features. Indeed, libraries can give individuals a quiet place which is an ideal environment for students to study with the highest concentration. For example, some of my friends confirm that studying in the school library is likely to be less distracted by noise and other people. Additionally, since everyone can post information on the Internet, the online sources seem to not be reliable for learning. That is the reason why students still need libraries whose materials are censored carefully in order to provide precise information for readers.
In conclusion, while the benefits of online information can outweigh those of conventional libraries, I believe that libraries which provide a good place to study as well as credible knowledge still play an important role.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, i suppose, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39743589744 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93804506602 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0530755951 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1428571429 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173011851526 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719836711804 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357854029062 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109286581056 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346325443665 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.