Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
The easy to learn trend on the internet and accessing information on the infinite number of topics change the way of adapting knowledge and skills among people. The students have a wider range of platforms available on different websites to get anything at any time. It is argued that the possibility of finding any resource and information on internet declined the necessity of books and libraries. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this statement because the libraries are always a conventional and reliable source of getting structured form of data and information.
In one hand, the benefits of having instant information by searching directly through the internet make it versatile and adverse to learn everything with comfort. The latest videos on YouTube channels can impact also over people to let them know about different skills and developing new habits. Social media platform also influence the behavior and personality of the public, they adopt the trends and debate over any issues to share their opinions and advice among the public. The daily updates on current affairs and histories easily found on the internet but not necessarily it is right, sometimes it is fraud, biased and unreliable which make it difficult for users to acquire and consider it. The privacy of the user would be accessed by cyber hackers and use it for criminal activity. Moreover, the lack of authentication and reliability make it controversial to choose as a source of collecting information.
On the other hand, the books have a sufficient amount of knowledge and have the number of cognition under different genres. The acquaintances of taking and reading books for developing the skills and acquiring right amount of information make it worthwhile. However, the libraries cannot be declined any time, may it have necessary developments and advancements over a period but it is not<span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="this "></span> dissolved anyway because of their reliability and consistency. The libraries took people together and unite them under one roof. The books have a lot of emotions involved in it to feel and understand which could not be found on the internet. Many countries set up new libraries for the public at free of cost charge to attract them to visit and learn and not going every time to search on websites.
In conclusion, I would argue that the libraries and internet both are a synthetic form of resources but the most dependable, honest and authentic form of getting information through books cannot be faded out and become more popular in future.<span class="hiddenGrammarError" pre="it "></span>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to trend'
Suggestion: to trend
The easy to learn trend on the internet and accessing informati...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ot be faded out and become more popular in future. ^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 10.4138276553 298% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 41.998997996 157% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2254.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34123222749 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.63132465107 2.80592935109 129% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528436018957 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 713.7 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4850634998 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.588235294 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8235294118 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905176597796 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0294981557547 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199127255201 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0588056774392 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270164301037 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.