In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
The transportation system of any country is the biggest channel for people to go from one place to another. By this, some people think that the government should spend a large amount of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. While others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. I totally agree with the first statement because trains are always the most preferable form of transport used by the public.
In one hand, the public transportation like buses is run through with the help of government fundings. They have a huge maintenance and repair cost which consistently depreciate the value of local transport. However, the poor connectivity among different cities by public transport consumes higher cost and time which is much lower in the terms of using trains. Especially, people who travel for daily work and going to the office, they have to maintain their time to reach their destination quickly, so they acquire fast traveling resources available near the home or city area.
On the other hand, the money spent on developing trains impact the growth of the country. To illustrate, the superfast and bullet trains create less time-consuming travel between the long distances which certainly save time and increase the productive hours. Additionally, the affordable cost makes it better for traveling anywhere. For example, Like India has a vast population and 2/3rd of people daily travel from trains which make it crucial as a source of linkage and income. Moreover, the high-speed trains change the infrastructure scenario and give immense competitiveness among other countries to set up new investment and job opportunities in the country. Furthermore, it also contributes to the GDP of the country and attracts tourists to visit and travel comfortably.
In conclusion, I support that the constructing high-speed trains fulfill the requirements of the public on different levels which affect the overall standard living of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es for very fast trains between cities. While others believe that money should be spe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32087227414 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91478265393 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582554517134 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6084829671 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332218303887 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113708159296 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148814101794 0.0667982634062 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201682321113 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196719634129 0.056905535591 346% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.