Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when leaving prison. Do you agree or disagree?
It is proven by scientists that people commiting crimes owing to their lack of education. People, therefore, think that the most effective instrument to get rid of crimes is to equip prisoners with jobs when they finish their time in prisons. I somewhat agree with this perception as the approach opens the opportunity for the crininals making money and dodge the negative impacts from other criminals, albeit it may not work out for those who habitually violate the law.
It is a well-known fact that the main inducement of crime is money. If the people who have done wicked things are enabled to land a job, they can make their livelihood. By having a stable source of income, the people can shake off poverty and better themselves. In the long run, given the benefits received from their education when being imprisoned, former criminals can raise their living standard and become a good citizen of their community.
Another merit of job training for former criminals is that it alienates them from the impacts of criminal peer effects, the phenomenon at which law-breakers under the pressure of their like-minded friends, re-offend the regulations. This would not only pose a threat to society but place them at risk of more severe sentences due to recidivism. The education for those who are used to violating the law, would ameliorate the implications that the habitual criminal behaviors have on them.
Admittedly, there are law-breakers who have a tendency to repeat their scrupulous acts and education and job training may not be able sufficient for those people to get rid of recidivism. As criminal behaviors integrate to some people's personalities, and gradually becomes their nature. The educational support of the authorities for them may not be necessary. However, these people are few, it thus still needs the interference of responsible individuals and organizationa to provide proper work training for the prisoners.
In sum, I mostly side with the view that people who are kept in prison should be educated about work. The method provides the former law-breakers with chance to make their living and relieves them of the drive to re-commit crimes, even though it may not work on individuals who have the tendency to repeatedly disobey the law.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11528150134 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79496756415 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54691689008 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0297859686 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25139212238 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914804969576 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045766448613 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147358277878 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404757217711 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.