Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people say that traditional classes, in which students can meet and interact with one another, are much better than online classes. From my perspective, I strongly agree with this statement for some reasons detailed below.
First and foremost, undoubtedly, students can properly benefit from ordinary classes. Communicating with friends, interacting with and starting friendships with new people can all be done when people are allowed to meet one another in person. In addition, social skills such as teamwork and direct interaction , which are some of the most crucial and necessary skills in modern times, are only boosted effectively in open environments like regular schools and classes. Furthermore, students can absorb a larger amount of necessary knowledge much better at school than at home.
However, besides the great advantages of regular classes, online classes have been taking an undeniable role in modern study, especially during the COVID-19 outbreak. What to say, instead of taking time off from school, students can use their electronic devices, such as smartphones and iPads, to take online classes. Furthermore, students can still talk with one another or interact with their teacher without needlessly violating social distance. Somehow, online classes can be the best solution for introverted students who are not really into social activities and love to spend time on their own instead.
All things considered, though I am introvert, I love to spend time at school with my friends and teachers. It is nothing better than having good times with our beloved ones at school while building our relationships, skills, and knowledge personally.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 309, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... such as teamwork and direct interaction , which are some of the most crucial and ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, really, so, still, while, in addition, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45173745174 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76014535249 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.617760617761 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0761228945 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179051134811 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732569221129 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422540847874 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11721171804 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148339462114 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.