In recent years, extremely developing technology not only has given beneficial opportunities but also brought problems for communication of people I think it's a negative progress and I will explain it in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, the availability of internet facility and well-structured applications such as facebook, instagram make it possible for people to contact with each other easily and fast. People can connect and share their opinions with everyone by using these social sites. Although it allows talk people who live far from there, it impacts negatively face-to-face communication. For instance, they spend time for taking pictures, scrolling newsfeed or messaging rather than meeting with friends, talking with family. Therefore, smartphones or computers contribute to separate gradually our close people from us and to steal our real feelings.
Secondly, another drawback of advanced technology is that people can acquaint stranger by mentioned sites. Some internet users post their personal information, non-ethic pictures, which affects harmfully. For example, many adolescents did suicide due to the insulted comments which people left and plenty of people can be victim because they contacted closely unknown men who can be criminal. In order to prevent these problems, my country has implementer “unfriend” movement recently. Thus, when you want to use those apps, criteria is needed to make new friends.
In conclusion, it seems to me that technology alter the interactions in the society. As I see, if people use them without restriction, they would be alone and only thing they have is their posts or comments with no actual communication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ems for communication of people I think its a negative progress and I will explain ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58984375 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11443281714 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69140625 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5072961242 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212168728793 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681304721778 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407012519921 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116340145404 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371137623647 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.