With emerge of the technology; human lifestyle is reshaped by technology. The way of human interaction with each other and, social relationship and communication are highly influenced. Despite the advantageous side of technology that affects our life, there is several disadvantageous sides of technology that harms our relation. This essay will first argue in which way technology is influenced our relation, then analyze whether its influence has been beneficial or harmful.
Technology has changed way of the communication. New type communication methods are faster, easier and prevalent than those of past. In a minute, people get contact with their relatives or school friends independently of distance without paying any relentless fees. Besides the individual interaction, mass communication becomes popular thanks to social media. Hence, particularly new generation get news from celebrities in a minute and ordinary people share their own views to millions via social media. The reasons above, people no longer need face to face communication or travel to seeing their relatives. Technology has been eased our communication, however, it has a lot of drawbacks affecting our social life and physiology.
Technology not only has changed our interaction but also deeply deteriorate our behavior and personalities so drawbacks outweigh benefits. First, the term virtual friend arises with the development of technology. Nowadays, every people have a vast amount of friends but feel alone because all of friendships become virtual. Secondly, human beings become lazy and unsocial since technology provides faster and easier communication. Hence, human stuck on their messengers or mobile phone without going outside to talk with friends. In past, person wanting to communicate had to do physical activity such as going post office to send to letter or telephone box for calling. Technology makes human change our life negatively while reshaping our interactions.
To sum up, it is undeniable that technology has permanent impacts to our life. One of its colossal effects is interactions with human beings. Despite the beneficial sides, it left irredeemable damage to our personalities and way of the living.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 531, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...out going outside to talk with friends. In past, person wanting to communicate had to d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1885.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61011904762 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1149313419 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5267110377 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.7619047619 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250247305115 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751316521105 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544362161434 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148868165431 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411485271254 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.