The two charts show how employment is divided in Tanzania and Ireland
The two charts demonstrate the rates of employment in Tanzania and Ireland in, 1999.
While the greatest sector in Ireland was services, the one in Tanzania was agriculture. The energy and water sector in Ireland did not Tanzania in that year.
The sector with the greatest difference between the two countries was agriculture. Most of the Tanzania people were employed on farms. However, the rate of people working in this field in Ireland was significantly low. On the other hand, in Ireland services had the highest proportion of employees. This rate was almost five times as much as the rate of workers in services in Tanzania. (14%)
Both the ratios of Manufacturing and construction in Ireland were higher than those of the sectors in Tanzania. Under a quarter of the Irish population worked in factories whereas the rate in Tanzania was much smaller. The difference of construction rates, however, was little in two countries. In Tanzania construction had the smallest percentage. In Ireland, it was energy, though.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 863.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16766467066 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88343095064 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.4856495386 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 66.3846153846 112.824112599 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8461538462 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274948472379 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117606914422 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949855456096 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227041454328 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112113236261 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.82 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.