This is an undeniable fact that technology has revolutionized people's lives in different ways. Recent technological advances have made significant contributions to the means people establish relationships with each other.
By the introduction of modern technology, a wide variety of means are now available to people in order to contact each other. In past, people had two options in front, either to take a trip or to send a paper letter to the ones they wished to get aware of. This was, most of times, a long process and inconvenient as well. Nowadays, however, by the use of cellphones and computers, people can make a contact in merely a few seconds. Not only can they hear each other's voice, but they can establish a visual contact by which they are capable of seeing one another.
Some people may find it bothersome when it comes to their privacy. Some believe that recent improvements in technology has made them unable to stay away from all distractions caused by other people. However, this is just a minor problem as the studies show that modern technology is gaining more and more popularity among the average people. Technology has made communications simpler, more convenient, cheaper and faster which makes it known as a positive improvement.
Overall, recent enhancement in communication tools has brought a variety of methods to make a contact either by text and voice or even pictures and live visual chat. In spite of the disadvantages some people may deem for this, I believe that its advantages far outweigh its disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
... people in order to contact each other. In past, people had two options in front, eithe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
... they wished to get aware of. This was, most of times, a long process and inconvenient as wel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, second, so, well, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04263565891 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96554184513 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600775193798 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2053336226 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218070701936 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775018520291 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496382722511 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134818297638 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551822747693 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.