Task 2 Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

Task 2: Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?

Task 2: Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Essay:
In recent years, the consumption of imported food has gained popularity. In my opinion, this has both positive and negative effects in equal measure.
First of all, imported food can bring beneficial to the economic development. Because it can offers to consumers more choices. Thanks to the act of importing food people come over around the world can enjoy the products that non-existent in their own nation. For example, Vietnam and Thailand were two nation where famous for supply rice the most in global, so many European country and the United States have chosen them to import rice by reason of the reasonable price and the top standard. So it will be a huge loss if we rely on the local products. The second reason is import food from different parts of the world can encourages healthy competition among food processing company, and this will lead to increase food quality. As a result, import food can contribute to a country’s development.
However, the drawback of imported food should not be overlooked. The act of transporting food from a country to another have need of frequently use plane or cargo ship. But airplane or freight ship are the most fuel-hungry means of transport in the world. For instance, a typical Boeing747 burns thousands of gallon of fuel per flight and such amount of gasoline burnt is harmful to the atmosphere. Furthermore, preservatives are often added in perishable food so it does not spoil during the transporting time, and some people fear that much chemicals in product will detrimental to the daily use.
In conclusion, I would argue that import food from various parts of the world are generally positive although it have some negative impacts. However, in my opinion, the society should take a good care in transporting food and how to preservative in the right way.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...beneficial to the economic development. Because it can offers to consumers more choices...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 93, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'offer'
Suggestion: offer
...he economic development. Because it can offers to consumers more choices. Thanks to th...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 302, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
... example, Vietnam and Thailand were two nation where famous for supply rice the most i...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...porting time, and some people fear that much chemicals in product will detrimental t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...orld are generally positive although it have some negative impacts. However, in my o...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99082568807 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76370722091 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565749235474 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4932682339 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484489968375 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158716466642 0.084324248473 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18164640993 0.0667982634062 272% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364560659712 0.151304729494 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.321523056175 0.056905535591 565% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.