While some people argue that there are many contributors retaining a worker, it is claimed that the main factor is income. From my perspective, I totally agree with the former because promotion and acknowledgement in the workplace are of more vital significance to keep an employee working for the same organization.
The foremost reason why promotion is more essential for workers because it allows them to develop themselves and move up the career ladder. This can be explained by the fact that people can obtain a deep understanding of their specialised field, which facilitates them into having a stronger foundation in the workplace. If employees show a long-term commitment to the company and have great improvements in working productivity, they will get a golden opportunity to get promoted. As a result, those people have more power in the working environment and become a better version of themselves.
Another contributor driving a person to stay working for the same corporation is recognition from people. This results from the fact that employees want to be highly appreciated for their efforts and dedication to their company. According to a recent survey, 70% of Vietnamese teenagers showed a strong preference for companies respecting their contribution by organizing meals or a travel tour for employees. Therefore, compliments from employers and colleagues are considered as a source of inspiration to drive staff to continue working in the same organization.
In conclusion, I believe that promotion and acknowledgement in the working environment are more remarkable factors to encourage workers to stay working in the same company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...showed a strong preference for companies respecting their contribution by organiz...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42471042471 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24091661352 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579150579151 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.4570705988 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248788259922 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863132670695 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488785408548 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142848485342 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019665031202 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.