There are more cars on the roads these days and more accidents are happening As a result some politicians have suggested that people should take regular driving tests throughout their lives rather than one single test What do you think are the advantages

In contemporary times, road accidents are a growing concern among people all around the world. With the increasing number of vehicles on the roads, the number of road crashes is also rising. Therefore, some political figures recommended that the driver should reevaluate continuously for the safety of the road. It has both advantages and disadvantages. In the following paragraphs, both views will be discussed and finally, my opinion will be given.

To begin with the advantages, firstly, it will help the drivers to keep with the up-to-date rules and regulations, as a result, drivers will be concerned when they drive on the roads. For example, in Nepal, the rules that are related to the roads update after every 4 years, and also the driver has to renew their license every 4 years by giving a driving assessment. In addition, the number of accidents will be decreased and also it will degrade the number of vehicles which will be environmentally friendly. Furthermore, retesting will help to know about the health condition of the drivers which is the most important part of driving.

Turning to the disadvantages, first of all, multiple time tests in a year will increase the burden on the people. Not only that but also it will increase the cost of this sector and the government will have to spend more money. Therefore, it will affect the economy, moreover, it will take lots of time due to the lack of manpower. For example, in Bangladesh, people have to wait a long time for the driving test due to the shortage of staff. In this case, more tests will be hard for the authority to manage all of these things and make the situation worse.

In conclusion, to sum up all the points above, the reevaluation test of the drivers is necessary to increase the safety of the people. But accidents can be reduced by using alternative ways. Hence, in my opinion, the advantages can not outweigh the drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83890577508 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75667636911 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504559270517 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7323622435 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6470588235 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4705882353 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137541991473 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497527520447 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344146072242 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861975040275 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344315845252 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.