There is an excessive number of cars on our roads today and this leads to many problems. Individuals and government should ensure that public transport plays a more important role in modern life in order to tackle there problems.
To what extent do you agree with this statement ?
Many problems nowadays are caused by enormous number of cars on urban roads. Residents and local government should enhance the role of public infrastructure to solve this alarming trend. In my opinion, I completely agree with this statement, because mass transit became an integral part of everyones life.
First of all, environment is suffering from exhaust fumes that are produced by cars. Undoubtedly, it has a bad impact on our health system too, to be more specific on lungs due to serving as a main respiratory system. It should be noted that carbon dioxide releases from cars which consequently leads to the air pollution reaching an intolerable level. Moreover, rapid increment in private owned vehicles has caused roads become more congested.
Secondly, coping with this issue by using public transportation it the best way. As a result of that level of contamination would decrease and it is clear that the existence of public transportations will automatically reduce traffic problems. Therefor government should increase taxes on private cars. For example, by the years people are becoming more financially independent and can easily afford cars. This tendency is the main cause of increase. In addition, people should only use cars on urgent situations. For instance, when being on a hurry, although expresses buses exists it that case. You
To sum up, I believe that if government improve public infrastructure services, people will be more attracted to use them. In that case not only people would safe there cash, health and time, but also approximation of problems such as global warming would slow down.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s caused roads become more congested. Secondly, coping with this issue by usin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 613, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...expresses buses exists it that case. You To sum up, I believe that if government ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2337164751 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87826945392 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651340996169 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6934148568 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.375 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220909438918 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624176355751 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408625214261 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119751066101 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524301352072 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.