There is an increase in production of consumer goods and this damaging the nature. Why is this happening ? What could be done for this ? Support your writing with personal evidence examples of your own.
Owing to the advancement in the technology, people find more comfort in their working zone and in home. There is continuous rise in the production and consumption of consumer goods both tangible and intangible products. No doubt overproduction of anything become dangerous to environment and cause abrept damage to the atmosphere.
The reasons why sudden increase is seen in consumers good are given below. To get more comfort people always find alternative ways that reduce their stress that may have adverse effect on nature such as use of non-reusable things. Intangible items are for one time use as their life span is not more than few days or months such as plastic water bottles and plastic carry bags. As people feel more convenient to use them. For example, distilled mineral water bottles such as kinley and bislery are for only one time use, as it adds huge chunk of plastic pollution and it directly cause drastic damage to the environment. Due to their non-biodegradable nature, it remains as it for several years and disturb the balance of ecosystem.
To reduce the consumption of these goods it directly lower their production in the market. Firstly the government should made strict policies that banned the consumption of damaging items and their production also. However, some items are necessary for modern world such as automobiles but their usage can be reduced and make them more eco friendly. Second most important is, people should also aware that such items destroy the nature so it directly lower their production as well as consumption. In Himachal Pradesh and in other states of India plastic bags are banned by the government and people are forced to carry cloth bags for shopping and for other purposes, is good initiative for better and eco friendly development of society is worth mentioning here.
In conclusion, people should prefer tangible products that has long shelf life. The government authorities should impose strict laws to prevent further damage to the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...c water bottles and plastic carry bags. As people feel more convenient to use them...
^^
Line 2, column 582, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...nk of plastic pollution and it directly cause drastic damage to the environment. Due ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowers', 'lows'?
Suggestion: lowers; lows
... consumption of these goods it directly lower their production in the market. Firstly...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... of damaging items and their production also. However, some items are necessary for ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowers', 'lows'?
Suggestion: lowers; lows
...items destroy the nature so it directly lower their production as well as consumption...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, still, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11854103343 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71643090619 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7653532811 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110863551723 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420052254259 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344810187894 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664337609489 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170046688308 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.