You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The given table provides the collective information about the date of opening, distance covered (in kilometers) and usage by passenger per year (in millions) of underground railway systems in six big cities such as London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto and Los Angeles.
Overall, it is found that first underground railway stations were opened in London whereas recently opened in Los Angeles. However, largest distance covered by London systems but Tokyo railway system but Tokyo railway system maximum used by passengers per year.
In London, railway system opened in 1863 and it covers 394 kilometers; and carries 775 million passengers per year while Kyoto railway system covers very little distance just 11kilometers and carries only 45 million passengers per year as a comparison to other cities as well. Furthermore, maximum passengers carried by Tokyo underground railway system, 1927 million followed by Paris, 1191 million passengers per year whereas it covers less distance as compared to Paris, 155kilometers and 199kilometers, respectively and both opened in early nineteen. Washington DC railways opened in late nineteen's (1976), it covered 126 kilometers distance and 144 million passengers used underground railway system per year for traveling while Los Angeles railway system is the newest system(2001) and the route it covers is 28kilometers with carrying capacity of 50 million people.
In conclusion, London underground railway system is the oldest one while the maximum number of people traveled using Tokyo railways and Kyoto covers the minimum distance as compared to other big cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the largest'.
Suggestion: , the largest
... recently opened in Los Angeles. However, largest distance covered by London systems but ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, so, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54471544715 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76549468809 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483739837398 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 413.1 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2911632614 43.030603864 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 194.857142857 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1428571429 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129548411954 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824950184478 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369326670264 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106584561496 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314299450288 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.49 61.2550243902 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.