In these recent decades, people who have various generations work together in the same workplace and it is extremely normal. However, it can have both pros and cons. They have different thought and mindset. In contrast, they can help to each other to improve at their workplace. From my point of view, they should work together and attitude to be a positive person for their company and it has more advantages. In this essay, the aforementioned will be discussed.
It is certainly obvious that people in different generations have various dreams and sometimes they are not able to understand each other. It can incline to create many problems at work. For instance, the youth want to learn more and achieve their goals or chase their dreams as soon as possible and they are extremely active in their workplace although, the middle age employees tend to be a manager and they do not want to learn more or sometimes they don not have a tendency to work unconsciously. In this condition, young people believe that the old one cannot work and the elderly do not allow the young to improve simultaneously.
Another issue is that these both generations can help to each other. Definitely the elderly has a wide range of experiences and they are able to teach them to the youth. Furthermore, the young people can respect them and realize that they are precious for their organization and also utilize of their knowledge. Hence, both categories can work in the same room.
All in all, in spite of the fact that both groups have different targets and thinking, they can improve the level of the organizations. In addition, both generations can learn several things from each other. Personally, I have been learning several issues from my colleagues who are older than me and I am grateful that have been getting familiar with these people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84713375796 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67568238743 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480891719745 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3300378144 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5294117647 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148934043699 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572063259033 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387564827026 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10321745434 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363153196667 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.