These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
With regard to the pace alterations in the world of work, there is a combination of various employees in terms of age. Evidently, such a transition may prove to be decidedly a mixed blessing.
There are certain disadvantages to this situation in which a mixture of various generations works together. In some cases, the age gap between workforce could lead to more arguments through which the young may be aiming to show how intelligent they are, posing a company to fall behind the others, so much so that shareholders would not feasibly coin it. The added demerit to this is that there might be experience-related discrimination in such a workplace in which some skilled men do not have an interest in training fresh ones or those who have recently graduated. It is for this reason some hold this view that is to say the more age-related differences staff members possess, the more trouble they might cause.
The advantages of such a collaboration are perceived significant so that these merits can plant more seeds of success and profits in the future of a company. In other words, the existence of a group comprised of different ages can help these inexperienced employees blossom through learning the experience senior staff have gained. By sharing their own knowledge, these senior ones also can seize the opportunity to put themselves one step ahead of the others, contributing to promotions and bonuses they can receive. In effect, our own eyes and ears register it: diversity fuels, not undermines, prosperity a company enjoys. An amalgam of various generations, therefore, can occupy center stage in delivering a multitude of benefits for the company and all its workers.
In conclusion, much as there might be some drawbacks in terms of arguments and discrimination, under no circumstances can we turn a blind eye to the fact that such cooperation can act as a catalyst for bringing more and more success to an organization. In fact, a rising tide lifts all boats. As a result, these probable cons pale in comparison with those pros bearing fruit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENTIRELY_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'group composed of'?
Suggestion: group composed of
...any. In other words, the existence of a group comprised of different ages can help these inexperie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, in other words, in some cases, with regard to, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01466554689 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579710144928 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4978015204 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.214285714 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140021179409 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480457893045 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430289312307 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718309968561 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417030940465 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.