In the modern world of today, most of the big companies necessarily have a multi-generational work environment. Although, some believe that that there are certain disadvantages to this situation, I totally agree with those who believe that this issue creates more advantages at work environment. I will discuss these two points of view in this essay.
To begin with, one of the most conspicuous facts is that, as companies tend to use experienced employees to increase their efficiency, human resource managers recruit new personnel in order to maintenance of the organizational agility. Therefore, these two contradiction issues drive a majority of companies to have people of different generations working together under the same roof. Firstly, a diverse working group can observe a situation at multiple perspectives, which leads to meaningful discussions and solutions. In contrast, if all team members are at the same age, they might not realize the critical opinions of other age groups.
Nevertheless, there are many reasons why it is difficult to work in a multi-generational company. One primary reason is that people from different age groups typically have different mindsets since, it may be challenging to collaborate with a colleague who is at another stage of life. This issue might cause some conflicts within a team decision-making process. For example, young professionals tend to act quickly to seize the opportunities instead of deliberately think about the situation as senior employees do. Another reason is that the old employees might lack in technological knowledge as comparing to the youth, which may lead to a conflict situation in future and can also create a sense of unworthiness among the older generation employees.
In conclusion, people should embrace the multi generations mixed in today’s workplace because its benefits shadow the drawbacks mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: that
...ork environment. Although, some believe that that there are certain disadvantages to this...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'collaborating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: collaborating
...t mindsets since, it may be challenging to collaborate with a colleague who is at another stag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49319727891 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28924930611 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622448979592 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3226197326 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213782756675 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699275539591 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540615928624 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120207669876 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307739402815 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.