The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

In the modern world of today, acquainting with vast market of products is quite complicated. Some believe that all kinds of the notifying of generated goods and services are not only futile but are also harmful. I totally disagree with this point of view.

Firstly, one of the most conspicuous facts is that, individuals have a great tendency to use well-known qualitative products. Due to, a competitive market of products and services, there are extensive diversity of choices that people are faces. Thanks to advertising, Society is able to recognize all kinds of goods that are produced. Moreover, purchasers would be able to compare prices and, other criteria which influence consumer behavior such as, quality and delivery conditions.

Secondly, the pivotal aspect that needs much consideration is that, in view point of enterprises, ads are opportunities to presents their goods to costumers. Moreover, marketing and merchandising are known as two inseparable important parts of commercial world. In the other words, most of the successful companies are found based on advertising because, as they are more introduced, their sell would increase consequently.

Finally, it is an undeniable fact that, prohibition of advertising is not only absurd but also, it will have bad effects on manufacturers. Whilst, the trade market becomes more restricted, the job opportunities will decrease consequently, which lead to unemployment. Furthermore, lack of information about products in the market will be baffling in a case of what people want to choose or buy.

In conclusion, therefore, based on above discussion, it seems fair to suggest that, advertising as long as do not lead to inconvenient, will be useful and fruitful.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as, quality and delivery conditions. Secondly, the pivotal aspect that needs ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42435424354 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16943453744 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7523098951 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111554299512 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347746350954 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344356369764 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0624792281253 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336020115901 0.056905535591 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.