I think it is beneficial that goods like foods, electronic devices, and cloths that produce in certain part of the world are available to access for all people anywhere in the glob. For this reason, the similarity between various countries is growing more and more.
Firstly, people have access goods in different region that could not use before. There are a verity of goods that produced in certain region in the world, so people living in other places normally could not take advantage of them in the past. To instance, some fruit like bananas and pineapple are growing in specific places like tropical countries so, the people living in colder countries do not used to consume. Nevertheless, most of people in the world can buy this kind of fruits from shopping center anywhere.
Secondly, today people migrate to different countries with less fear of becoming homesick since the products they have used are available in shops almost whenever they go. For example, Iranian immigrants could not cook their favorite dish, ghormesabzi, in other parts of the world because the specific vegetables do not grow and find in other countries. In the other words, they can buy all ingredients in almost shopping center around the world. Thus, the immigrants can live productivity and happily because, they have access to all needs and do not miss their cultural heritage.
In conclusion, I believe that the growing of similarity between countries in the world, which have resulted from availability of goods produced elsewhere is desirable development. This situation is beneficial for people who migrate to other countries and lead to have less stress and more productive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
...s do not used to consume. Nevertheless, most of people in the world can buy this kind of fruit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60341398171 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501831501832 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1303910024 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269710957334 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104499706257 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635022661364 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176188606566 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510566237784 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.