Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
There is a growing trend that differences among states have been evaporating and if the tendency continues, soon countries may lose their distinctions completely. Although some aver that these changes are malevolent, I think that they are rather beneficial. Below the reasons on which my claim is based will be discussed.
To begin with, there are those who are afraid of the globalization and who state that it kills their local culture. For instance, in Russia traditional national restaurants have being substituted by outlets of such multinational corporations as McDonalds and Subway. At the same time, it seems that this is a symptom of natural cultural evolution of the mankind; the change signals the origin or birth of a new cosmopolitan culture that knows no demarcation lines. The tendency will likely bring peace in many countries because the less differences people have, the less hostile they are to one another.
Furthermore, spreading of the same goods around the globe brings other advantages as well. For example, production on a big scale allows firms to sell more stuff for cheaper prices and this might be solving in the nearest future many problems of poor, developing African countries which citizens will be getting access to cheap and high quality seeds of corn and wheat. Thus, having a possibility to use the same grains as Americans and Europeans may help them to fight famine in their homelands.
Moreover, such items as cell phones, e-tablets and laptops have been becoming more accessible in recent years because of mass production. Thus, even inhabitants of remote locations may have those items to be in touch with the world. In other words, the current trend increases standards of living among people.
To sum up, there are those who see a menace in impending globalization but closer look at the situation reveals that the fearers are based on a desire to preserve obsolete life-style. The changes appear to be inevitable and they promise to be rather positive than negative.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
developing African countries which citizens will be getting access to cheap and high quality seeds of corn and wheat.
developing African countries when citizens will be getting access to cheap and high quality seeds of corn and wheat.
developing African countries in which citizens will be getting access to cheap and high quality seeds of corn and wheat.
Sentence: To sum up, there are those who see a menace in impending globalization but closer look at the situation reveals that the fearers are based on a desire to preserve obsolete life-style.
Error: fearers Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
Need more disadvantages in the second paragraph. advantages can move to the third and fourth paragraph.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 331 350
No. of Characters: 1646 1500
No. of Different Words: 205 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.265 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.973 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.677 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 112 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 57 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.462 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.733 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.286 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.572 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.02 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun differences is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ing peace in many countries because the less differences people have, the less hosti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, i think, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12084592145 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75293732959 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616314199396 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1773220289 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140070416671 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365499604482 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380316404751 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675375438717 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366775887443 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.