In the competitive environment of modern businesses, managers need to boost their company’s efficiency and productivity. Having more motivated and encouraged employees makes this goal more approachable. Some believe that basing wages on producing and selling is the best way. To some extent, I agree with the issue and, believe that this method would be the best in some cases.
On the positive side, the aspect that needs more consideration is that, as humans, we all are responsible for providing the life costs through working. As much as we work, employers pay us. There are several kinds of jobs that the result of staffs’ efforts could be determined unit by unit easily. The rate of sales or production, for example, is the most suitable criterion that could measure the efficiency of many workers simply. Therefore, connecting the workers’ income to how much they sell or produce could motivate and encourage them to work harder.
On the opposite side, opponents believe that the result of many employees jobs is not countable. Furthermore, several other unexpected factors affect the workers’ efficiency. It has proved that some other indicators, such as the state of economy, unpredictable political issues, and even extreme weather conditions, have a significant impact on employees’ sales and production. Therefore, setting the method that fastens salaries to outputs is inappropriate and could demotivate workers in such cases.
In conclusion, I think every manager could have the best choice and establish the paying wages system according to the occupational situation of individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42231075697 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97811363231 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613545816733 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.116666596 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2142857143 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191574444559 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0689284681309 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967840122386 0.0667982634062 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104881609648 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651831384246 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.