As businesses become more competitive, almost every manager is now trying to motivate their employees to put more effort into their job performance, and a common way of doing so is basing an employee’s salary on their rate of production a one of the most effective methods if encouraging and motivating people to be hardworking, in the workplace, is to give them parsing depend on their productivity, in terms of production and sales. In my opinion, I agree with.
In one hand, in competitive statement companies search the ways that can engage employees in positive competition and try to work harder to more profit. In fact, one of the mail reason people work in an office is money. We need money to support our family, our personal needs and to live in this world. Then a large of employees are motivated and enthusiastic to put all their energy and strength when aware they would be paid according to their efforts. Hence, the company s ranking and revenue will improve.
On the other hand, some people have the opinion have pay to staff for raising in sales would not be any negative impact on others. Any form of rewards like a plane ticket, certificate, holidays is quite restricted in terms of utilization however money would give the employee complete freedom on how to spend it. for instance, may be a staff want to give for his mother with the additional wage he might earns. This is a result of the consciousness that their salary is depended on how much thy produce or sell. For this reason, they would compete with coworkers to be the best and this will lead to improve sales and produce.
In conclusion, I believe that deciding how much an employee should earn based on them sales or production is a good method. Employers when awareness about earn more money than try more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and try to work harder to more profit. In fact, one of the mail reason people wor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 965.302439024 154% => OK
No of words: 315.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71746031746 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65988176907 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 106.607317073 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 283.868780488 165% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.1136001778 43.030603864 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 106.142857143 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0142798543351 0.215688989381 7% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00573057086125 0.103423049105 6% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0111241745369 0.0843802449381 13% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00760980327167 0.15604864568 5% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00802031469231 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.