Nowadays in many countries smoking in shared areas is against the rules. There are many psychological and social reasons for government to legistate against those who smoke in Community. I totaly agree with the issue and in this essay I will discuss it.
First and formost, the main reason that smoking in public places should be band is preventing people from having to breath in second-hand smoke. It is obvious that smoking not only harms the smokers but also those who are nearby. Passive smoking can lead to many smoking-related deseases such as, lung cancer, heart attack and stroke. Recent studies have shown that People who constantly stay near Smokers are 5 times more likely to catch nicotin-related diseases. Another reason that authorities should ristrict the number of smoking-permitted places is preventing children and Youngsters from copying smoking habits. Cigaret addiction has the tendency to spread out of the smoking population over the non-smokers. A greate deal of young people fall victims to smoking because they imitare adults with Lighted cigarettes in the mouth, whom they are likely to meet in society.
In contrast, traders advocate that it is wrong to restrict smokers in public places. They justify that it can negatively affect the sales of tobacco. They believe that plenty of smokers have quitted smoking since this restriction was first introduced. this issue has resulted in bankrupcy of mang Cigarette manufacturers and consequently in tax Payments to the government. Moreover, opponents claim that it is unfair to limit the rights of smokers and they should be premited to smoke anywhere.
In conclusion, although some merchants believe that officials should allow smoking anywhere, I think they should keep this desision active for a long time in order to preserve health of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 76, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'banded'?
Suggestion: banded
...that smoking in public places should be band is preventing people from having to bre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ieve that plenty of smokers have quitted smoking since this restriction was first...
^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... this restriction was first introduced. this issue has resulted in bankrupcy of mang...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2457337884 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77675204095 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9330432019 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236606176144 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767278630061 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535206601828 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12655377992 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769623982028 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.