In the complex space of modern companies, managers need to boost efficiency and productivity to stay on top of the competitive market. Some believe that basing wages on producing and selling is the finest way to achieve this goal. To some extent, I agree with the issue. I, however, believe this method would be the best in some cases.
First of all, as we all are humans preparing for the living costs is pivotal to be done by every person. Thus, all employees work to earn money much more and, as the best reason, they engage in serious competition with their colleagues. Therefore, awareness about effective factors on their salary leads them to arrange their financial plan in a hardworking direction and consequently their output. Although, there are other factors like job satisfaction, working environment, etcetera that determine whether an employee could be motivated to work in an organization or not, but, money is the main determining factor.
On the opposite side, opponents believe that one of the most conspicuous facts is that, the performance of many employees cannot simply be quantified by the rate of sales or production. Moreover, a number of unexpected factors affect the worker’s performance. For instance, it is proved that the state of the economy, unexpected political issues, and even extreme weather conditions all have a significant impact on how much the employee sells or produces. Therefore, basing wages on how much sell or produce can demotivate workers in such cases thus, this method could not be appropriate. A hurricane, for example, can easily devastate a farm and all its products without its laborers being responsible for any of the damages or the ensuing drop in crop rates.
In conclusion, I think every individual manager could have the best choice and set the wages according to the occupational situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1554.0 965.302439024 161% => OK
No of words: 304.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11184210526 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86851158718 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 106.607317073 175% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615131578947 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 283.868780488 174% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2400360717 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208119365296 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763849852759 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813535140263 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118268030822 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682383681131 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 40.7170731707 223% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.