Some think the best way to motivate and encourage people to work hard is to pay them based on how much they produce and sell. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
I would like to disagree to the concept of salary level which measured based on production and sell quantity, which conceptualized as Key Production Index (KPI). In 1888, the ancient left thinker, Karl Marx has predicted that in the modern era, the rule of industrialization should be transform from quality to quantity production, and it is represented ‘the nature of capitalism’.
In another hand, we should acknowledge that the implementation of KPI has motivated plethora of workers to allocate their more time increasing the number of production and sell. They have to minimalized their intermission and family time for gaining bigger salary then before. Sociologically, they should earn proud based on their economical achievement, albeit they do not gain true happiness. In addition, Prof. Tanaka Aishi, a Head of the Department of Psychology, University of Harvard described that 40% of workers in America were depressed due to fabrication’s pressure.
As a negative consequence of KPI, some economic expert substituted it by implementing Key Performance Index which the wage, reward and punishment achievement should assess with the holistic indicators, i.e. dicipline, cleanliness, loyality, quality of production, as well as leadership. The main idea of Key Performance Index is concern to put the quality of production and humanity principles in the top business priority. Afterward, while KPI established, many industrial sectors in the world have been applicating it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'transformed'?
Suggestion: transformed
...the rule of industrialization should be transform from quality to quantity production, an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...antity production, and it is represented 'the nature of capitalism'. ...
^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 'the nature of capitalism'. In another hand, we should acknowledge t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 226.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65044247788 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44100168545 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654867256637 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.9213649051 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.7 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0814739328158 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293240650786 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355378368973 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0509607510356 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236148633845 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.