These days many of us prefer to throw damaged things away whereas in past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitude?
It is a fact that nowadays public do not try to fix broken things. There are several reasons for this situation and there are few impacts of this also. Both causes and effects will be discussed further.
Examining the reason for crowd do not prefer to repair damaged things, the most common one is they can replace the old with a new piece is quite cheaper than to fix it. This is because in this technological era everything becomes more complicated and costly as it uses advanced technology. For example, a mobile display got damaged and you want to get replaced that cost the same as the new phone nowadays, so, people prefer to buy a new one rather than spending on old ones.Furthermore, technology is improving day by day. This mean and product that you bought yesterday will be not the same tomorrow and that resist a person to invest money in the old one.
The mentioned causes have some impacts too. The foremost effect is a recycling of old products could not be possible as a person do not want to use that further. Furthermore, plastic bags that are in used for conveyance not get recycled then it will damage the environment of the world.
To conclude, it can be finally commented that there are many causes of not to reuse items such as the weird attitude of people and always want to have new things, which has bad impacts that are mainly related to the environment as well as lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t that nowadays public do not try to fix broken things. There are several reasons...
^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ation and there are few impacts of this also. Both causes and effects will be discus...
^^^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t common one is they can replace the old with a new piece is quite cheaper than t...
^^
Line 3, column 477, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ew one rather than spending on old ones.Furthermore, technology is improving day by day. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tic bags that are in used for conveyance not get recycled then it will damage the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, so, then, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1615.20841683 71% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56126482213 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52356606725 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553359683794 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3505379584 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202449370709 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071662658766 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464591819336 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110295684584 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415991395208 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 78.4519038076 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.