People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves, their families and the society, so working hours should be restricted. Do you agree or disagree?
People’s opinions differ regarding whether the amount of working time should be limited. While there are adverse impacts on individuals who are overloaded by work, I would assert that it is better to keep labour time funds flexible.
On the one hand, it is indisputable that we might have to cope with numerous undesirable issues if we spend a considerable amount of time working. According to several studies, for example, the average adequate time an employee should consume to work is a maximum of 9 hours per day. If that time is overloaded, individuals are more vulnerable to physical and intellectual health, which means that their private lives are subsequently more or less affected. Moreover, the company's increased exploitation of employee labor could be witnessed more prevalent, and workers might become controlled robots to work with outstanding productivity, eventually worsening the job markets and society.
However, I also believe that the working time should be determined by employees depending on their cases. The first reason is that in the current complex and competitive life, there are many residents who need to work hard to make expenses of living and take care of their families. If working hours are restricted, this might lead to a precarious life in the low-finance-condition workforce. In addition, a great amount of work can be backlogged if it does not allow employees to work overtime, therefore making the prosperity of the companies be devastatingly affected.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it is not appropriate to limit the labour time funds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er to keep labour time funds flexible. On the one hand, it is indisputable that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25390625 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11600022424 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59765625 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8600580842 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254603329393 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100704464376 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704550571353 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137412521128 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962670382266 0.056905535591 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.