People tend to work longer hours nowadays. Working long hours has a negative effect on themselves, their families and the society so working hours should be restricted.
Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, working long hours has become a controversial topic. Personally, I strongly think this trend has an impact on everyone. For that reason, I disagree with how this is going on daily.
To begin with, spending more time at work can indeed have a detrimental impact on workers' health and work performance. This is because extended hours of work can lead to both physical and mental fatigue. As a consequence, individuals may find it challenging to maintain high levels of concentration on their tasks, increasing the likelihood of errors and mistakes. For instance, according to a survey, individuals working more than 10 hours per day often take longer to complete tasks that would typically be accomplished more quickly and accurately during regular working hours. Consequently, prolonged hours at work can significantly decrease work productivity. In the past few years, an average working shift has usually been eight hours. Recently, this has changed suddenly; every worker is now required to work more than eight hours in order to meet the company’s criteria. To make matters worse, the government hasn’t done anything about this problem. If this goes on, it would affect the hospitality. Working for a long period of time led to failing physical and mental health in an individual. Therefore, employees will be obligated to take sick leave, have poor work performance, and have low productivity. For instance, many workers have said that their health has been in a bad state since the changes to working hours.
On the one hand, spending much time at work is, firstly, extremely exhausting and stressful. Regarding physical health, people need time to refill energy, which was lost with a pile of documents. Secondly, workers will have less time to spend with their family members. When that happens, the relationships will leave a mark on the worker's mental health. Although working long hours has many demerits, the time spent is proportional to the money earned.
In conclusion, longer working hours can pose detrimental effects on individuals’ lives in terms of their health and their work productivity or even lead to isolation in society as a whole. Working hours should be reduced to an optimal level so that workers can have time to improve their quality of life, widen their point of view in various aspects of nature, and learn new skills to apply to work. Moreover, they can help the office improve outside of the office.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...can indeed have a detrimental impact on workers health and work performance. This is be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: maintaining
...ce, individuals may find it challenging to maintain high levels of concentration on their t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1028, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ect the hospitality. Working for a long period of time led to failing physical and mental heal...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11940298507 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79159012418 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0885971816 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4782608696 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86956521739 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381965636129 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113350275113 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102421850246 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235866610002 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082792969347 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.