These days some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Spending money on sports and cultural events is not new. However, a new trend has been formed among a group of people in societies. They spend lots of money to go to sporting and cultural events. I believe it has more drawbacks than earning. Nevertheless, via the weighing of gains and losses, I will demonstrate that this is a negative trend.
Activities such as world cup, Olympics, and Concerts have their own fans and they strongly support them as they cause the flow of money and it helps the economy of the host society, while their effect is extremely short-term and they cause pollution in those societies. Consequently, it imposes an undesirable cost for treating many who become sick due to pollution. The waste has been produced during these events not only does not disposed properly but they are usually left in the suburb and rural areas.
Another con is those who spend their money on these activities have less money to spend on some more important activities such as educational and family activities. A research shown that these types of people remarkably suffer from a bad economic situation and most of them have difficulty in their relations with families and friends. As a result, they are unhealthy psychologically.
To sum, the disadvantages of putting money on tickets for sports and cultural events dramatically overweight its benefits. It is recommended that governments use media to educate people better and alert them about the consequences.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'dispose'
Suggestion: dispose
...d during these events not only does not disposed properly but they are usually left in t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15573770492 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82907731366 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598360655738 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4852175202 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7692307692 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7692307692 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248200213733 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945840092892 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118071137884 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150368732814 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0982524109907 0.056905535591 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.