Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that to be a successful sportsperson, one needs to have a natural ability. Others think that hard work and practice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

What makes an athletics successful? is a question that divides people into two groups. One group believes it is mostly their natural ability while the other puts more weight on being diligent in exercises. In this essay, both views will be discussed and based on both views the author will mention his own views at the end of this essay.

There is no doubt that inheriting some specific genes makes one more talented at learning techniques and tactics related to a special field and therefore, they are a head and shoulder above others in their fields. However, the talent has to be addressed in the right direction to be able to show its value. Those sportspeople such as Messi who are in the right field as they supposed to be based on their potential shown great achievements in their sports life.

On the other hand, the innate potential is not the predominant factor for some. They believe hard work and practice open the close doors for everybody. There are many who has no obvious talent in their realm but due to their diligence and hard work have reached the highest level of in their sport's branch. For example, Hadi Tabatabaei an Iranian goalkeeper is not as tall as other goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural ability but due to his persistent and diligent exercise, he managed to be the first goalkeeper in Iranian the national team.

in summary, among different parameters which lead to the success of a sportsperson, some have a stronghold on natural ability while others put hard work and practice ahead of natural ability. I believe based on the mentioned views, there is no doubt a person with talent and diligence and exercise will always be ahead of others but it does not mean that talent is the predominant factor. It is just a catalyzer which makes the process faster and easier for those who have it.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Is
What makes an athletics successful? is a question that divides people into two...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reat achievements in their sports life. On the other hand, the innate potential ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 419, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seem'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: seem
...her goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural abili...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 419, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...her goalkeepers which means he does not seems to be successful based on natural abili...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...eper in Iranian the national team. in summary, among different parameters whi...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, in summary, no doubt, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74311926606 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48554443746 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510703363914 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.5688227571 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30708598944 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099464863207 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734293184588 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186962102591 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629490580759 0.056905535591 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.