These days young children spend a lot of time using computer, tablets and smartphones phones. Some people think that introducing children to technology at a young age is beneficial. Other believe that they would no benefits from introducing the children to technology at young age.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
With the steady growth in modernization the life style of people have been greatly affected. They have achieved various milestone; however, some issues remain unchallenged and as complex as ever. One such topic here is of introduction of technology to the children at a very young agr. The particular topic asserts that Do introduction of children to the technology at a very age is fruitful or noy?. Through this essay, I shall explore the dimensions of given topic through examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
To embark with, on the one side of argument there are group of people who believe that it is fruitful for their children to introduce them towards technology at a very young age. Electronic devices like computer, tablets and smartphones flourish the motor skills of children because while playing games on these devices they unknowingly improve their hand eye coordination as they are playing games only by noticing on the screen. Moreover, children can grasp lot of data from the internet access through these devices.
However, there are group of people who believe that these electronic devices effects the health of their children as these children always stay stick to games on these devices and procastinate the outdoor activities which in the long run leads to serious health issues like obesity as well as serious postural deformities. In addition to this, the games on these device encourage the aggressive thoughts and felling among the children with those violent games which they play on these devices. For instance, the recent survey conducted by The Tribune among the schools of New Delhi asserts that nearly 70% of youngsters are suffering from obesity because of less outdoor activities.
Nevertheless, weighting both the opinion, I believe that introducing children to technology is fruitful for improving some skills, but as we all know all glitter is not gold these devices restrict the mobility of children so parents should provide these electronic devices for fix time period and encourage their children also for doing outdoor activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 55, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
..., on the one side of argument there are group of people who believe that it is fruitf...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
...gh these devices. However, there are group of people who believe that these electr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this device' or 'these devices'?
Suggestion: this device; these devices
...ties. In addition to this, the games on these device encourage the aggressive thoughts and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at introducing children to technology is fruitful for improving some skills, but ...
^^
Line 7, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow all glitter is not gold these devices restrict the mobility of children so par...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19705882353 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67675337873 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.3771510818 49.4020404114 179% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.25 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33876802856 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124006820179 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818921365199 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213144161158 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691003596316 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.