The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear energy provides cheap and clean energy.
The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that global harmony and unity is maintained by having a nuclear weapon risk. I totally disagree that the benefits of maintaining world peace and cheaper energy outweigh the drawback of mass destruction.
Firstly, a nuclear explosion can possibly trigger the human extinction. The destructive effect of nuclear attack if the control of this explosive device is on the hands of an arrogant leader can never be under estimated. For example, the nuclear test initiated in Japan few decades ago affected marine creatures widely. The nuclear reactions brought the mass killing of whales and fish as well as the destruction of coral reefs. Thus, there is a clear indication that the power of nuclear weapon only benefited a few.
In addition, the idea that nuclear power is a source of cleaner and cheaper energy does not hold a valid argument. This notion was refuted by many because of the fact that there are more alternative sources of energy that are renewable and sustainable. Good examples are solar energy and wind power. Although the cost of operating the plant was higher because it is still in its experimental stage, in the long run, it is expected to efficiently operate at a minimal cost. This clearly confirms that there is a better option available and relying on the use of nuclear energy is not necessary.
In conclusion, although there are advantages of nuclear energy such as international peace and low-cost source of fuel, the high risk of human eradication and other sources of energy should be taken into consideration. I disagree that nuclear power is more important than human life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...uction. Firstly, a nuclear explosion can possibly trigger the human extinction. The destr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...gument. This notion was refuted by many because of the fact that there are more alternative sources of e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as well as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.236301369863 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.130136986301 0.155533422707 84% => OK
Adjectives: 0.154109589041 0.0946595960268 163% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0582191780822 0.0501214627716 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0205479452055 0.0437548338989 47% => OK
Prepositions: 0.157534246575 0.122226691241 129% => OK
Participles: 0.0342465753425 0.0403226058552 85% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71049375687 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00342465753425 0.0326793684256 10% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102739726027 0.0861772015684 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0102739726027 0.021408717616 48% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00684931506849 0.011925033212 57% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1620.0 1933.35771543 84% => OK
No of words: 270.0 316.048096192 85% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20517956788 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381481481481 0.374742101984 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281481481481 0.28420135186 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.17037037037 0.203846283523 84% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111111111111 0.137316102897 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71049375687 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.037074148 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57037037037 0.56093040696 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.5766040417 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2857142857 20.7743622355 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5034598671 49.517814964 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 127.492653851 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7743622355 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.814263465372 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 47.4338624339 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.04918032787 1.69124875643 121% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464420897368 0.332605444948 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0900184991454 0.102741220458 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0535441509844 0.0668466124924 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.562126194687 0.534860350844 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147255153593 0.148594505496 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.206692201604 0.134430193775 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094836964677 0.0742795772207 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.399856881898 0.324371583561 123% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0335186673809 0.0638462369009 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345898426929 0.228012699653 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377366012245 0.058150111329 65% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 5.90881763527 51% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 4.0 10.4468937876 38% => More topic words wanted.
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.