All countries used nuclear weapons to protect their country and as well as maintain the world peace. This is good think but the nuclear power have far more negative consequence. I totally disagree from that statement that the nuclear power provides unexpansive and clean environments and also this is completely wrong and disagree that the advantages of nuclear technology is outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, we all know that the technology is growing day by day and in this modern era the nuclear technology have lots of advantages it has far more negative results for planet. we know that nuclear weapon is use for country protection but if someone use this weapon for their own benefit and if this all weapon of war seem to belong someone so that will destroy the whole nation. For instance, in 1945 the US government destroy the whole Japan country from nuclear bomb and 222600 people were die on this attack. And those nuclear attack was damaged the whole social life and environment. And still now in 20 century when the baby born in Japan it high chances that he/she was borne disable because of nuclear consequence.
Secondly, for manufacturing of nuclear weapon or weapon or war to save the country and for world peace it required a lots of budget and it is also damage the economics for example if these money distribute in charity it will reduce the Poverty and also if these budgets in any other project which will help full for economy that will increase the jobs. And all the countries and the whole world live friendly and as a humankind so the nation will no need to protect the country from nuclear weapons.
To conclude, the weapon of war not provide the save and clean environment and the benefits of nuclear power is extremely less. The nuclear power is merely use for protection not for saving the planet. its damage the pollution and the economy of the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighed
...the advantages of nuclear technology is outweigh the disadvantages. Firstly, we all k...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...s far more negative results for planet. we know that nuclear weapon is use for cou...
^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...e for country protection but if someone use this weapon for their own benefit and i...
^^^
Line 3, column 611, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
...fe and environment. And still now in 20 century when the baby born in Japan it high cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'weapon or'.
Suggestion: weapon or
... Secondly, for manufacturing of nuclear weapon or weapon or war to save the country and for world p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...country and for world peace it required a lots of budget and it is also damage the eco...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'damaged'.
Suggestion: damaged
...equired a lots of budget and it is also damage the economics for example if these mone...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 184, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...lso damage the economics for example if these money distribute in charity it will reduce th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
...emely less. The nuclear power is merely use for protection not for saving the plane...
^^^
Line 7, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Its
...r protection not for saving the planet. its damage the pollution and the economy of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78658536585 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48624263479 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466463414634 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.9432352998 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.01903807615 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327390331844 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134718210361 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724437395981 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23365130357 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670560383727 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.